Ahead of Consensus.
Intelligence across tech and capital markets, for investors, policymakers, and business leaders.
9 minute read
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company closed its second quarter the way it has closed nearly every quarter of this decade: by beating its own guidance, then beating it again. Revenue reached NT$1.27 trillion, a year-over-year gain of 36 percent, translating to $40.2 billion and landing at the very top of management’s $39.0 billion to $40.2 billion forecast. Net income told a still sharper story. At NT$706.56 billion, profit climbed 77.4 percent from a year earlier and 23.4 percent from the prior quarter, a fifth consecutive record and a result that cleared the consensus estimate of roughly NT$632.6 billion by a wide margin. Diluted earnings per share came to NT$27.25, or $4.31 per American Depositary Receipt.
One qualification belongs alongside those figures. Roughly NT$63.2 billion of net income came from the sale and remeasurement of TSMC’s stake in Vanguard International Semiconductor, a one-time gain that inflates the headline number and should be set aside when assessing the durability of underlying profitability. Strip it out and the quarter still stands as one of the strongest in the company’s history, evidence that the current cycle has considerable distance left to travel before its economics begin to soften.
Gross margin landed at 67.7 percent and operating margin at 60.3 percent, both above the high end of guidance issued just three months earlier. In an industry defined by capital intensity and cyclical volatility, a foundry expanding its margins while simultaneously building fabrication capacity on three continents is not a common combination. It reflects something more specific than operational discipline. TSMC has quietly begun raising prices on its most advanced nodes, reportedly by 5 to 10 percent for customers including Nvidia, Apple and AMD, and the market has absorbed those increases without apparent resistance. That is the clearest available evidence of genuine pricing power, the kind that exists only when a supplier’s technology has no adequate substitute.
The order book supports the same conclusion. June revenue alone reached NT$442.68 billion, up 67.9 percent year over year, a print that broke what had been a reliable seasonal softening pattern in that month. First half revenue for 2026 came to NT$2.4 trillion, up 35.6 percent. Both N3 manufacturing capacity and CoWoS advanced packaging, the process that binds AI accelerators to high bandwidth memory, are sold out through the end of the year. When a supplier’s capacity is fully booked months in advance and its prices are still rising, the constraint is not weakening demand. It is a shortage of capacity to meet demand that already exists.
The composition of that demand has shifted decisively. High performance computing, the category that captures AI accelerators and data center processors, now accounts for 66 percent of TSMC’s revenue, up from roughly 61 percent a year earlier. Smartphones, once the company’s largest platform by a wide margin, have fallen to 22 percent and declined a further 4 percent sequentially. This is no longer a mobile cycle business that happens to have an AI segment attached. It has become an AI infrastructure company that continues, almost incidentally, to serve the phone makers who built its reputation.
The technology mix confirms the direction of travel. Chips built on 7-nanometer processes and beyond made up 77 percent of wafer revenue, with 3-nanometer contributing 30 percent and 5-nanometer 33 percent. The 2-nanometer node, TSMC’s newest and most consequential architecture since the transition to FinFET transistors, has already reached 3 percent of wafer revenue despite having only just entered volume production. That figure will grow quickly, and its early economics, still diluted by the cost of ramping a brand new process, are the principal reason management has repeatedly guided margins lower than the results it then delivers.
None of this comes without cost, and the cost is rising. TSMC has guided 2026 capital expenditure toward the top of its $52 billion to $56 billion range, with Chief Financial Officer Wendell Huang signaling that spending over the next three years will run well above the pace of the previous three. That commitment, made by a company already spending at a scale that rivals the largest hyperscalers, is itself a statement about how long management expects the current demand cycle to persist. Sell-side analysts are already extending that timeline. Following the earnings call, Citi held its 2026 estimate near $55 billion but lifted its 2027 and 2028 capital expenditure forecasts to $75 billion and $80 billion respectively, treating this year’s record spending as a floor rather than a ceiling.
That is the paradox sitting at the center of TSMC’s story. The company is not spending aggressively because demand is fragile and needs support. It is spending aggressively because demand has already outrun the capacity available to meet it, and every dollar of capital expenditure is, in effect, a dollar of revenue TSMC cannot yet capture.
The immediate market reaction was restrained, which was itself informative. Shares barely moved in the hours after the release, as investors withheld judgment until management’s commentary on the call clarified the outlook for the second half. That reticence gave way quickly once the call concluded. Citi raised its price target from NT$2,875 to NT$3,800, implying a valuation near 25 times 2027 earnings and the highest target on the Street, while Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Barclays and HSBC had already pushed their own targets into a range of $575 to $625 per ADR ahead of the print.
Context matters here, because the stock did not arrive at this quarter unscathed. Shares had pulled back roughly 10 percent from their late June high after Goldman removed TSMC from its Asia-Pacific Conviction List and a broader semiconductor selloff erased an estimated $1.3 trillion to $1.4 trillion in sector market value in a matter of days. That correction reflected valuation fatigue and macro anxiety more than any weakening in TSMC’s underlying business, and this quarter’s results make that distinction explicit. Commanding roughly 60 percent of the global foundry market and an estimated 90 percent share of advanced semiconductor manufacturing, TSMC does not merely participate in the AI infrastructure buildout. It is the mechanism through which that buildout physically happens, and its second quarter is the clearest signal yet that the mechanism is still accelerating.