Ahead of Consensus.
Intelligence across tech and capital markets, for investors, policymakers, and business leaders.
9 minute read
Uber Technologies delivered one of those quarters that resist a single verdict. Gross Bookings rose 24 percent year over year to $58.0 billion, 22 percent once currency effects are stripped away, comfortably ahead of the roughly $57.2 billion Wall Street had penciled in. Trips grew 18 percent to 3.9 billion. Monthly Active Platform Consumers climbed 16 percent to 208 million, a reminder that Uber is still adding users at a pace many mature platforms would envy. Non-GAAP earnings per share of 81 cents matched consensus and represented 35 percent annual growth, while GAAP diluted earnings per share reached $1.17, up 85 percent from a year earlier.
Yet revenue, the line investors watch most closely, rose only 12 percent, to $14.19 billion, narrowly missing the $14.24 billion analysts expected. The company traced the shortfall to a change in how it books fares in Britain rather than to any cooling in demand, and free cash flow over the trailing twelve months crossed $10 billion for the first time in Uber’s history. It was, by nearly every operating measure, a quarter that argued for the bull case. The stock fell anyway, down roughly 3.5 percent on the day, a decline that had less to do with what Uber reported than with what it forecast next, and with the unresolved questions sitting just beneath the numbers.
The distance between bookings growth and revenue growth becomes legible only at the segment level. Mobility bookings rose 22 percent to $28.99 billion, helped by the FIFA World Cup, staged across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, which drew more than eight million tourists into Uber’s cars in host cities over the quarter. Mobility revenue, however, barely moved, up just 1 percent to $7.36 billion. Delivery told the opposite story: bookings rose 26 percent to $27.46 billion, revenue rose 28 percent to $5.25 billion, and segment operating income climbed 38 percent to $1.06 billion, the fastest profit growth anywhere in the business. Freight, still the smallest and least forgiving segment, grew bookings 25 percent to $1.57 billion while narrowing its operating loss only marginally, to $24 million.
The explanation for Mobility’s flat revenue lies in tax policy, not pricing power. New value-added tax rules that took effect in Britain this January ended a scheme that had let ride-hailing platforms remit tax only on their commission, prompting Uber to restructure driver contracts outside London around an agency model in which fares pass through drivers rather than through the company’s own accounts. Uber says this change, and others like it, cut companywide revenue growth by eight percentage points this quarter, a distortion that Gross Bookings, the more honest measure of platform activity, does not carry. Corporate costs, meanwhile, crept upward: combined General and Administrative and Platform Research and Development spending rose 18 percent to $1.1 billion, a pace management will need to slow if segment profit gains are to survive the trip to the bottom line intact.
Sitting above these operating results is Uber’s pending acquisition of Delivery Hero, the German food delivery group whose fate has quietly shaped this earnings cycle. Announced on July 16 through a business combination agreement, the deal has a Uber subsidiary offering 41.50 euros a share, valuing the target near $14.8 billion. Expected to close in the second half of 2027, the transaction would widen Uber’s combined mobility and delivery presence from 79 markets to 99 and is expected to add to non-GAAP earnings per share. To fund it, Uber assembled a 14.2 billion euro bridge facility led by Morgan Stanley, with Bank of America and Deutsche Bank also committing capital, structured to hold leverage below two times earnings and protect Uber’s investment grade rating. Delivery Hero’s largest shareholder, Prosus, has already committed irrevocably to tender its shares.
The transaction also illuminates an otherwise puzzling line in Uber’s income statement. Equity method investments on the balance sheet jumped from $287 million at the close of 2025 to $3.8 billion by June 30, a rise that tracks closely with the period in which Uber built the nearly 25 percent direct stake in Delivery Hero, plus a further 12 percent of exposure through derivatives, that ultimately became the basis for its July offer. Viewed against that timeline, the $1.6 billion pretax gain on equity investments that helped push second quarter GAAP net income to $2.4 billion reads less like a stray accounting entry than an early signal of value Uber had been quietly accumulating for months. None of this slowed the buyback: Uber repurchased $518 million of stock in the quarter and $3.5 billion across the first half of the year.
Uber’s long-term ambition, in Chief Executive Dara Khosrowshahi’s own description, is to become the world’s largest platform for autonomous vehicles, a goal now backed by a commitment of more than $10 billion over the coming years. The quarter demonstrated just how uneven that path can be. Uber and Waymo have already wound down their robotaxi arrangement in Phoenix, and the two companies have said their exclusive partnerships in Atlanta and Austin will end by early 2028, a retreat that follows fresh scrutiny from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over how autonomous vehicles behave around emergency responders.
Elsewhere, the news broke the other way. On the same day Uber reported earnings, Transport for London granted Private Hire Vehicle licences to Wayve’s autonomous Ford Mustang Mach-E fleet, completing the triple lock of operator, driver, and vehicle licensing that British regulators require before self-driving cars can carry paying passengers. More than 100,000 Londoners have already joined a waiting list for early rides, with limited trials expected later this summer ahead of a broader public launch. Together, the two developments capture Uber’s underlying strategy: spread exposure across more than 30 autonomous vehicle partners rather than stake the company’s future on any single relationship, a posture that looks wiser with each new wrinkle in the Waymo alliance.
In the end, investors priced the quarter against what lay ahead rather than what had already happened. Third quarter guidance for Gross Bookings of $58.25 billion to $60.25 billion implied a midpoint of $59.25 billion, just short of the roughly $59.3 billion consensus, and the projected non-GAAP earnings per share range of 84 to 88 cents fell below an 89 cent estimate tracked by LSEG. That gap, more than anything in the second quarter itself, explains the sell off, and it extends a year in which Uber shares have fallen roughly 12 percent even as the Nasdaq has risen about 14 percent.
Wall Street’s positioning ahead of the release already hinted at this unease. Bank of America trimmed its price target to $103 from $104 while keeping a buy rating, and firms including TD Cowen, BTIG, and BMO Capital held bullish views with targets ranging from $91 to $119, a spread that sits well above the current share price even as the stock lags the broader market. That distance between analyst optimism and investor behavior says something true about Uber today: a company converting growth into cash faster than almost any peer, tied to an unfinished acquisition and an autonomous vehicle strategy whose eventual winners remain, for now, an open question.